"Many critics of the perfect Bible like to point out that the original King James had
the Apocrypha in it as though that fact compromises its integrity. But several
things must be examined to get the factual picture. First, in the days in which our
Bible was translated, the Apocrypha was accepted reading based on its historical value,
though not accepted as Scripture by anyone outside of the Catholic church.
The King James translators therefore placed it between the Old and New Testaments for
its historical benefit to its readers. They did not integrate it into the
Old Testament text as do the corrupt Alexandrian manuscipts.
That they rejected the Apocrypha as divine is very obvious by the seven reasons which they gave for not incorporating it into the text. They are as follows:
1. Not one of them is in the Hebrew language, which was alone used by the inspired historians and poets of the Old Testament.
2. Not one of the writers lays any claim to inspiration.
3. These books were never acknowledged as sacred Scriptures by the Jewish Church, and therefore were never sanctioned by our Lord.
4. They were not allowed a place among the sacred books, during the first four centuries of the Christian Church.
5. They contain fabulous statements, and statements which contradict not only the canonical Scriptures, but themselves; as when, in the two Books of Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes is made to die three different deaths in as many different places.
6. It inculcates doctrines at variance with the Bible, such as prayers for the dead and sinless perfection.
7. It teaches immoral practices, such as lying, suicide, assassination and magical incantation."
-Sam Gipp, The Answer Book
Not to say there is nothing to be learned or gained from these books. I myself have aquired several fruitful pieces of knowledge from the apocrypha books, as well as other non-canonical texts such as The Shepherd of Hermas. But they are not to be regarded as the inspired words of God.